Career College students' perceptions of Rubrics Orientation
by Strunk, Vicki Alane, Ed.D., SPALDING UNIVERSITY, 2011, 169 pages; 3542066

Abstract:

The majority of all states utilize rubrics as indispensable facets for measuring students' writing achievements for standardized tests. The problem is that rubrics are not used consistently in writing classrooms in Career Colleges. The purpose of this study was to look at N =62 ultra-nontraditional (students who have the same characteristics as nontraditional but who may be on welfare, have physical impairments, and who may not speak English as a primary language) and nontraditional Career College students and their perceptions of Rubrics Orientation. This quantitative research used descriptive and inferential statistics to address seven research questions regarding Career College students' perceptions of Rubrics Orientation. Students perceived critical thinking and correctness to be the two most important criteria of the analytic writing rubric. The students perceived that receiving a student "model" paper was a positive experience and receiving a "model" paper helped them with the completion of their own research-based essay. There was sufficient evidence that more than 50% of the students perceived that they wrote for conformity. This study revealed that there was not sufficient evidence that a rubric or a student "model" paper created a writer's block for the students, nor was there sufficient evidence that there is a difference between female and male research-based essay scores (p=.289>.05). There was sufficient evidence, however, that there was a significant difference among the three instructors' students' average time spent in class ( p=.046<.05). Students who stayed in class longer received a higher final grade for the course. In changing times of student-centered learning, Career College educators may need to re-evaluate the rubric as a necessary metric in the classroom.

 
AdviserLarry W. Lewis
SchoolSPALDING UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 74-02(E), Nov 2012
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsLanguage arts; Educational leadership; Rhetoric; Higher education
Publication Number3542066
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3542066
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.