A Comparison of Lower Extremity Joint Work and Initial Loading Rates among Four Different Running Styles
by Goss, Donald Lee, Ph.D., THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL, 2012, 119 pages; 3526126

Abstract:

The annual injury incidence rate among the 36 million runners in the United States is approximately 50%. The majority of those injuries occur at the knee joint. The purpose of this study was to measure lower extremity eccentric work and average vertical loading rates among four groups of runners. Seventy-four healthy runners volunteered for this study. The four groups of runners consisted of traditional shoe wearing rearfoot strikers (TSR), minimalist shoe wearing anterior footstrikers (MSA), certified Chi runners (Chi), and minimalist shoe wearing rearfoot strikers (MSR). Study variables were ankle dorsiflexion eccentric work (ADEW), ankle plantarflexion eccentric work (APEW), knee extension eccentric work (KEEW), and average vertical ground reaction force loading rates (VALR). Volunteers ran for five minutes at a self-selected speed on a Bertec instrumented treadmill with Vicon Nexus 3D motion capture. Eccentric joint work was obtained by integrating the negative portion of the joint power curves. VALR was defined as the slope of the vertical ground reaction force curve. TSR runners demonstrated greater ADEW, greater KEEW, and greater VALR than anterior footstriking runners. MSA runners demonstrated the greatest APEW with reduced ADEW, reduced VALR, and reduced KEEW compared to TSR runners. Chi runners demonstrated the least VALR, no ADEW, no significant additional APEW, and reduced KEEW compared to TSR runners. MSR runners demonstrated the greatest and potentially injurious VALR. The mere existence of the group of 17 MSR runners was an unexpected development. The prevailing thinking has been that runners who wore minimalist running shoes would automatically transition to using an anterior footstrike pattern. To our knowledge, this is the first biomechanical evaluation of Chi runners. These findings suggest Chi running may be a desirable alternative running style for a runner with a history of lower extremity overuse injuries or someone who desires to reduce potentially injurious forces on the lower extremity. Running with a rearfoot strike pattern in minimalist shoes may produce vertical ground reaction force loading rates that have been associated with injury. Clinicians should not assume that a runner who wears minimalist shoes uses an anterior footstrike pattern. Clinical evaluation and runner education are imperative.

 
AdviserMichael T. Gross
SchoolTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL
SourceDAI/B 74-01(E), Oct 2012
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsKinesiology; Biomechanics
Publication Number3526126
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3526126
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.