The Role of Ki 'Im in Orchestrating Contrastive Focus in Biblical Hebrew
by Park, Grace Jeongyeon, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES, 2011, 360 pages; 3515061

Abstract:

The so-called compound use of kî 'im has been interpreted mainly either with exceptive ('except' or 'unless') or adversative meaning ('but' or 'rather'), although it has sometimes also been interpreted in other ways such as 'only' or 'surely'. These various meanings have been applied without much consensus or consistency in previous discussions. In this dissertation, I have analyzed these so-called compound kî 'im constructions in terms of a new analytical schema that I call the Focus kî 'im Pattern, which provides a consistent way of analyzing these kî 'im constructions. Rather than seeing the combination of kî and 'im and as a single unit, I identify distinct functions for the two particles: kî functions as an adversative coordinating conjunction ('but'), while 'im introduces an elided antithetic conditional clause that orchestrates contrastive focus after kî 'im. The Focus kî 'im Pattern consists of a tripartite structure: [Part A] is a negative sentence, [Part B] includes a coordinating conjunction (kî) as well as an antithetical clause formed with 'im, and [Part C] repeats the verbal phrases from [Part A], placing the focused element before these repeated verbal phrases. It is noteworthy that [Part C] regularly marks contrastive focus by a change in word order (or ellipsis of non-focused material). Approximately three-fourth of the occurrences of kî 'im in the Hebrew Bible belong to the Focus kî 'im Pattern (120 out of 156 cases). My analysis of these kî 'im passages as examples of Focus kî 'im Pattern also clarifies the interpretation of many passages in the Hebrew Bible (for example, 2Kgs 23:9 and Ezek 44:9–16).

 
AdviserWilliam M. Schniedewind
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
SourceDAI/A 73-09(E), p. , Jun 2012
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsAncient languages; Linguistics; Biblical studies; Ancient history
Publication Number3515061
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3515061
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.