Relationships Between Adult Learners' Anxiety Levels and Cooperative Exam Scores
by Curless, Julie M., Ed.D., WALDEN UNIVERSITY, 2012, 133 pages; 3510371

Abstract:

Abstract More nontraditional, adult learners are entering higher education than ever before due to the continued growth in technology and current economic conditions that encourage adults to acquire additional skills for the workplace. The pressure for these students to do well in school and finish quickly can lead to increased anxiety associated with the high-stakes traditional exams used by many college instructors. This anxiety is a problem because for some adult learners, inflated stress levels negatively affect performance on exams and overall grades, therefore increasing the chances of dropping out. This study explored the potential relationships between adult learners' anxiety levels and their test scores from each phase of a 2-stage cooperative exam, an alternative to the traditional, individual high-stakes exam. The theoretical framework for this study included adult learning and constructivism. This nonexperimental and correlational research study used nonprobability, single-stage sampling. Using the Pearson r for correlations, results from the S-scale portion of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) were correlated with each phase of the students' cooperative scores. Results showed a significant inverse correlation (r = -.387) between adult learners' anxiety levels and their scores on the individual portion of a cooperative exam at a .05 alpha level, while showing no significant relationship between adult learners' anxiety levels and their scores on the group portion of the exam. This study supports using cooperative testing, thereby lowering adult learners' anxiety levels and improving the chances for achievement and graduation.

 
AdviserKelley Jo Walters
SchoolWALDEN UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 73-10(E), p. , Jun 2012
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational tests & measurements; Adult education; Educational psychology
Publication Number3510371
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3510371
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.