Using a consensus process to develop an evidence-based practice guideline for school exclusion for head lice (Pediculosis capitis)
by Myer, Michelle L., D.N.P., UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 2012, 266 pages; 3507134

Abstract:

Head lice infestation (Pediculosis capitis) is a common nuisance in young children, carrying a social stigma that associates infestation with poverty and poor hygiene. School exclusion laws, regulations, and policies for head lice are implemented to decrease spread in the school setting. Exclusion rules may be developed by the school, by the local education agency, or, as is the case in South Carolina, by the state health department. Exclusion criteria should be selected from the best available evidence, as policy decisions directly affect children's ability to attend school. Recently published pediatric literature containing strong opinion statements regarding exclusion warranted close consideration of existing exclusion criteria. Lice treatments have been extensively studied and evidence-based guidelines are readily available for school health and administrative professionals to use in recommending treatments to parents. The use of school exclusion, however, has been the subject of very little research, and high-level evidence for exclusion and readmission criteria has not been published. This paper presents the results of a modified Delphi consensus process used with school nurses to identify the best, most acceptable, criteria for school exclusion and readmission for school children with pediculosis.

 
AdviserJoan M. Culley
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
SourceDAI/B 73-09(E), p. , Jun 2012
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsNursing; Public health; Public policy
Publication Number3507134
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3507134
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.