The joint impact of victim conceptualization, relationship to perpetrator, and method of perpetration on non-traditional rape experiences
by Sapanski, Linda M., Ph.D., ADELPHI UNIVERSITY, THE INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED PSYCHOLOGICAL STUDIES, 2012, 171 pages; 3500913

Abstract:

Most empirical investigations of rape-related symptomatology have focused on either the relationship between the perpetrator and the victim (i.e., Stranger or Acquaintance), the method used by the perpetrator (Forcible or Incapacitated), or whether or not the victim conceptualizes the experience as "rape" (Acknowledged or Unacknowledged victims). Despite the importance of all three factors, little is known about the interaction between these factors on post-traumatic functioning. The goal of the present study was to assess the joint impact of these factors in order to evaluate their influence on the post-traumatic functioning of a national sample of women with rape experiences (N=789). Of particular interest were victims who knew their assailant, were incapacitated, and did not label the act "rape." It was hypothesized that these women would report significantly higher levels of substance use, stigmatization, and revictimization, and significantly fewer disclosures, than women with more traditional rape experiences. Elevated symptoms of PTSD and depression were expected in the whole sample. Though no three-way interactions were found, Method by Conceptualization interactions suggested that Acknowledged-Incapacitated victims were most at risk for symptoms of PTSD and depression, while Unacknowledged-Incapacitated victims were at risk for alcohol abuse. Consistent main effects were found for Conceptualization in which Unacknowledged victims reported fewer mental health symptoms than Acknowledged victims, supporting past research that suggests that not conceptualizing an assault as "rape" may serve a protective function for victims.

 
AdviserKate Szymanski
SchoolADELPHI UNIVERSITY, THE INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED PSYCHOLOGICAL STUDIES
SourceDAI/B 73-06, p. , Mar 2012
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsSocial psychology; Women's studies; Clinical psychology
Publication Number3500913
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3500913
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.