Principals' Perceptions of Methods of Receiving Professional Communications
by Grap, Sheila Irene Holderby, Ph.D., COLLEGE OF NOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND, 2011, 123 pages; 3494989

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to identify what principals perceive to be the most and the least effective methods of communicating professional information and their preferred methods of receiving information. The researcher also sought to discover the factors principals indentified as preventing them from receiving information and using the communication methods they prefer and the factors that enable them to receive information using the methods they prefer.

This research was initially undertaken to find how communications between school librarians and principals could be made more effective in light of research that shows the importance of principal's support for school librarians and library resources in promoting and enhancing student academic achievement. The researcher saw that it would be necessary first to examine the questions identified in this research.

A sample of 86 school principals from around the United States completed an online Preferred Communication Survey (PCS) developed by the researcher. Findings indicate that principals ranked meetings with other principals, visits to other schools, and discussions with school staff, which provide the opportunity for face-to-face communications, as both the most effective methods of receiving information and as their preferred methods. Principals identified mandates and notices from district and state officials, faxes, and unsolicited mail as both the least effective and their least preferred. These findings were true regardless of level of school or principals' years of experience.

The findings from this research relate to all professional communications with principals including information on library resources.

 
AdviserSharon Slear
SchoolCOLLEGE OF NOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND
SourceDAI/A 73-06, p. , Feb 2012
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsLibrary science; Educational leadership; Communication; Educational administration
Publication Number3494989
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3494989
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.