Use of Technology in Administrative Communication in a University
by Young, Stephen B., Ph.D., WALDEN UNIVERSITY, 2012, 169 pages; 3494380

Abstract:

The use of communications technology is constantly changing as many new devices become available for use. The challenge for many administrators is choosing which technology will result in the most effective and acceptable application for specific work groups and units. One objective of universities in communications is to use the most effective approach to communicating with students. The purpose of the study was to provide research on the perception of the usefulness of e-mail, cell and desk phones, video, and teleconferencing communications technology used to communicate between students and administrators in a private, for profit, university. The research question addressed the perception of technological devices most useful in communications between students and administrators. A qualitative case study design was used to examine the perception of communications technologies' relationships and patterns through the experience of participants in the use of e-mail, cell and desk phones, video, and teleconferencing. Data from interviews, questionnaires, surveys, and observations were coded into a priori themes aligned to the research question. Themes were analyzed through a pattern matching approach. The discoveries indicated that cell phones and e-mails were perceived to be the most useful compared to desk phones, teleconferencing, and video conferencing. The study contributes to social change by indentifying technologies that help universities communicate more effectively with students, which would allow universities to maximize the use of their technology resources to best support and enhance academic performance.

 
AdviserElizabeth Wilson
SchoolWALDEN UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 73-05, p. , Feb 2012
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsCommunication; Information technology; Educational technology
Publication Number3494380
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3494380
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.