Knowledge and Understanding of Function held by Students with Visual Impairments
by Cowan, Heidi, Ph.D., THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, 2011, 309 pages; 3493370

Abstract:

This study examined understanding of linear functions held by students with visual impairments. The purpose of this study was to determine students‘ level of knowledge and type of understanding of linear function and to describe students‘ abilities in using the four main representational forms of a function: (a) description, equations, tables, and graphs. Other aspects studied were students‘ preferred representation of function and students‘ perceived influences in his or her mathematics education. Participants in this study included four high school and four college students who were receiving educational services for a visual impairment and who had completed at least one course in algebra.

Data collection and analysis followed a qualitative research design. Three instruments were used for data collection, (a) the Mathematics Education Experiences and Visual Abilities (MEEVA) Interview, (b) the Function Knowledge Assessment (FKA), and (c) the Function Competencies Assessment (FCA). The MEEVA provided demographic information and responses provided information on students‘ previous educational experiences in mathematics. The FKA and the FCA were mathematics assessments that consisted of problems related to linear functions and their applications. Student responses from the FKA and the FCA provided information on student knowledge of linear functions and student abilities when solving word problems involving linear functions. Instruments were given orally and responses were audio recorded. Each participant met with the researcher one-on-one on two different occasions to complete the three data collection instruments.

Data analysis followed the tenets of the Constant Comparative Method (Glaser & Strauss, 1967). Student responses to the MEEVA, FKA, and FCA were transcribed and coded for student understanding in the four function competencies, (a) modeling, (b) interpreting, (c) transcribing, and (d) reifying as described by O‘Callaghan (1998). Students‘ level of knowledge of linear function was further described by students‘ ability to comprehend and apply knowledge when solving word problems, as described by Wilson (1971).

Results indicate that the understanding of modeling and interpreting problems involving linear functions of high school and college students with visual impairments was stronger than that of either translating between representational forms of a function or the ability to reify the function concept. A positive relationship was observed between students‘ graphing abilities and his or her overall understanding of function. Results also show that students were most comfortable with gaining information on functions through tables and were least comfortable gaining information through graphs. The perceived influences on students‘ mathematics education were that of individualized education and the use of appropriate materials that allowed for independent access to the curriculum.

 
AdviserDouglas T. Owens
SchoolTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 73-05, p. , Feb 2012
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsMathematics education; Special education
Publication Number3493370
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3493370
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.