Knowledge monitoring, goal orientations, self-efficacy, and academic performance: A path analysis
by Al-Harthy, Ibrahim S., Ph.D., KENT STATE UNIVERSITY, 2011, 100 pages; 3493176

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between knowledge monitoring and motivation as defined by self-efficacy and goal orientations. A path model was proposed to hypothesize the causal relations among predictors of the students’ total score in the Educational Psychology course. A correlational design was used for the current study. The sample consisted of undergraduate students enrolled in two sections of the Educational Psychology course at Kent State University. The data collection process took place during two semesters (Fall 2010 and Spring 2011). Subjects completed the knowledge monitoring accuracy (KMA) and combined scale of self-efficacy and goal orientations online. Students’ total exam score was used to operationalize academic performance. One instructor taught the Educational Psychology course during both semesters.

Results of the study confirmed the positive correlations between knowledge monitoring, self-efficacy, mastery goals, and total exam score. The path analysis revealed that two predictors had significant direct effects on total score, knowledge monitoring (β =.308) and mastery goals (β = .231). Self-efficacy had a significant direct effect on mastery goals (β = .456). Although self-efficacy significantly correlated with total score, the parameter between self-efficacy and total score was not significant (β = .071). Knowledge monitoring did not significantly correlate with self-efficacy and mastery goals. The path analysis revealed no significant exogenous parameters from or to performance goals.

The current study provided some insights in understanding the relationship between knowledge monitoring and motivation as defined by self-efficacy and goal orientations. Recommendations and suggestions for future research were discussed.

 
AdvisersChristopher Was; Albert Ingram
SchoolKENT STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 73-05, p. , Feb 2012
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational psychology
Publication Number3493176
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3493176
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.