The origin of variation in Norwegian retroflexion
by Johnsen, Sverre, Ph.D., HARVARD UNIVERSITY, 2011, 141 pages; 3491888

Abstract:

This dissertation deals with a phonological process in Norwegian called ‘retroflexion’. When a word ending in the tap / -r / is followed by a word beginning with an alveolar coronal / t d n s /, the / -r / deletes, and the alveolar surfaces as a retroflex coronal [ t˛ d˛ n˛ s˛ ]. The study presented here does two things:

One, this dissertation documents the variation that exists in Norwegian retroflexion with the use of production experiments and judgment experiments. It finds that retroflexion is obligatory for / t d n /, but optional for / s / (chapter 1). It finds that retroflexion is applied to / s / more often when the following segment is a consonant than when it is a vowel, and more often when that consonant is a / k / than when it is a / t / (chapter 2). Finally, it looks only at words in / sV- / and finds that for words that already exist in the language retroflexion is more common when the words has many frequent phonological neighbors, whereas for novel words retroflexion is less common when the word has many frequent neighbors (chapter 4).

Two, this dissertation accounts for this variation. For the different alveolar onsets we have production data for, / t- d- n- sk- st- sV- /, it finds that the larger the perceptual distance is between the alveolar and the retroflex, the less likely retroflexion is to occur. It is proposed that this correlation between perceptual properties and phonology has arisen through mechanisms of word categorization (chapter 3). For the dichotomy between existing and novel words in / sV- /, the crucial difference between them is that only existing words have a history. It is suggested that the transmission history of existing words plays a major role in how such words are produced by speakers. Since novel words have no transmission history, they are unaffected by such properties (chapter 4).

 
AdvisersJay Jasanoff; Adam Albright
SchoolHARVARD UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 73-04, p. , Jan 2012
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsLinguistics
Publication Number3491888
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3491888
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.