Effects of direct instruction on the use of and response to prepositions by students with an intellectual disability
by Hicks, S. Christy, Ph.D., THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE, 2011, 122 pages; 3491407

Abstract:

Students with an intellectual disability often struggle with significant language delays or impairments. Although this population of students can acquire language skills, they often require methods of explicit instruction of language skills to do so. Direct Instruction (DI), a system of explicit and systematic instruction, could be one of these methods. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of DI on the use of and response to prepositions by three elementary school students with an intellectual disability. A multiple baseline design across prepositions was used in this study with replication across students. The researcher used DI to model examples and nonexamples (i.e., "This is above," "This is not above.") of three prepositions (e.g., above, behind, beneath) to the students. In addition to the instructional sessions, students participated in three generalization activities. Results of this study showed a functional relationship between Direct Instruction and students' use of and response to prepositions. Students demonstrated the ability to use and respond to prepositions consistently after receiving DI on each of the three target prepositions. Furthermore, all three students maintained the skill up to 56 days from instruction on each of the prepositions. These findings are important to this population of students because of the need for explicit and systematic instruction of language skills; it has been demonstrated that DI is an effective instructional tool in teaching these skills in an efficient and effective way.

 
AdviserCharles L. Wood
SchoolTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE
SourceDAI/A 73-05, p. , Feb 2012
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsSpecial education; Language
Publication Number3491407
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» This is an open access dissertation.
  Use the link below to access the full text PDF of this graduate work:
  http://gradworks.umi.com/3491407.pdf
  Use the link below to search and retrieve all open access dissertations:
  http://pqdtopen.proquest.com

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.