Quantitative Breast Tomosynthesis Imaging: From Phantoms to Patients
by Shafer, Christina Mae, Ph.D., DUKE UNIVERSITY, 2011, 130 pages; 3490374

Abstract:

Breast cancer is currently the most common non-skin cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in women here in the United States. X-ray mammography is currently the standard clinical imaging modality for breast cancer screening and diagnosis due to its high sensitivity and resolution at a low patient dose. With the advancement of breast imaging from analog to digital, quantitative measurements rather than qualitative assessments can be made from these images. One such measurement, mammographic breast density (i.e. the percentage of the entire breast volume that is taken up by dense glandular tissue), has been shown to be a biomarker well correlated with cancer risk. However, a digital mammogram still suffers from its projective nature. The resulting overlap of normal breast tissue can obscure lesions, limit quantitative measurement accuracy, and present false alarms leading to unnecessary recall studies. To address this key limitation, several 3D imaging techniques have been developed such as breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), dedicated breast computed tomography (CT), and digital breast tomosynthesis (tomo). Perhaps the most recently developed modality is tomo, which is a limited-angle cone-beam CT of the breast compressed in the same geometry as mammography. Because tomo retains all the aforementioned advantages of mammography but adds depth information and can be built based on an existing digital mammography device, measuring breast density and extracting other quantitative features from tomo images was a major focus of this study.

Before attempting to measure breast density and other features from reconstructed tomo image volumes, the quantitative potential of this imaging modality was assessed. First, we explored a technique that measures tissue density using only the information from a single slice in the reconstructed tomosynthesis volume with geometrically simple tissue-equivalent phantoms. Once this task had been satisfactorily performed, we studied a probabilistic approach toward quantitation of the entire 3D volume. For this project, a 3D hidden Markov model (HMM) method was developed and applied to tomo images to segment the images into adipose and glandular tissue and then to estimate the volumetric breast density. Because adipose and glandular tissue is easily distinguished in MR images, patient breast MRIs were used to train, validate, and finally to assess the accuracy of our HMM segmentation algorithm for tomo density estimation. This accuracy was calculated by comparing the estimated tomo breast density to the density for the same patient’s breast MRI.

Another aim of our study was to investigate whether changes in macroscopic 3D imaging features can accurately predict the chemoprevention response that was measured with Random Periareolar Fine Needle Aspiration cytology for a uniquely young high-risk cohort of women. A univariate MRI density model was first developed to predict chemoprevention response but delivered relatively poor performance. Because they are so often studied conjunctively, several MR image texture features were calculated and incorporated with density into a multivariate prediction model. Adding image texture features improved the performance of our prediction model and provided a framework for developing a similar model for breast tomo images. This aim to investigate the potential of combining multi-modality macroscopic 3D imaging information with a cytological measure of risk and then investigating how response to tamoxifen and other chemoprevention treatment affects each of these risk biomarkers in young, high-risk women is completely novel in the fields of medical physics and biomedical engineering.

 
AdviserJoseph Y. Lo
SchoolDUKE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 73-04, p. , Jan 2012
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsBiomedical engineering
Publication Number3490374
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3490374
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.