Sex and Age Differences Across Domains of Self-Concept Among Alternative School Students
by Willean, Meghann Resetar, Ph.D., WALDEN UNIVERSITY, 2011, 110 pages; 3487019

Abstract:

Self-concept is a significant factor in the interpersonal and academic success of students, especially those who attend an alternative school because of learning disabilities or behavioral challenges. Previous studies have shown sex and age differences in global or unidimensional self-concept; however, none has explored sex and age differences in multidimensional self-concept among special needs students in alternative schools. Grounded in the foundation of the Shavelson-Marsh theory of hierarchical academic self-concept, this quantitative study explored the extent to which sex-and age-differentiation influenced self-concept among students attending an alternative school. Using the Piers-Harris Children's Self Concept Scale 2 (PHCSCS-2), self-concept was assessed in 6 domains (behavioral adjustment, intellectual and school status, physical appearance and attributes, freedom from anxiety, popularity, and happiness and satisfaction) of 37 male and 37 female students attending a suburban alternative school. Multivariate analysis of variance determined that sex differences existed in only one domain: Female students had higher levels of self-concept in the intellectual and school status domain. Analysis further indicated that age was not a mediating factor in self-concept. The implications for positive social change include building support for interventions intended to enhance self-concept of special needs students. Interventions to improve self-concept can help students to develop and enhance the skills necessary for a successful future. When counselors, educators, and administrators develop and implement age-and sex-appropriate strategies to improve student's self-concept, students will be better prepared to function academically, socially, and interpersonally.

 
AdviserElisabeth Weinbaum
SchoolWALDEN UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 73-03, p. , Dec 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational psychology; Special education; Counseling psychology
Publication Number3487019
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3487019
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.