Item Fairness of the Nonverbal Subtests of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test, Fifth Edition, in a Latina/o Sample
by Harlow, Simone C., Psy.D., GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY, 2011, 47 pages; 3485301

Abstract:

Every widely used psychological assessment instrument is under scrutiny in terms of cultural fairness. The expectation of the reduced-language (Nonverbal) section of the Stanford- Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition (SB5; Roid, 2003) is that language ought not to be a modifying factor in terms of final score. The purpose of the present study was to explore the effects of acculturation on performance on the Nonverbal subtests of this commonly used standardized measure of intellectual functioning in three groups: Latinas/os living in the U.S. four years or less, Latinas/os living in the U.S. five years or more, and Caucasian/White Non- Hispanics. The study explored whether there was evidence of differential item function (DIF) on SB5 nonverbal subtests for these groups. An analysis of variance was the procedure used for testing the null hypothesis, that the means of the three populations would be equal. It was expected that scores for each of the participant groups would be normally distributed. Group differences that were statistically significant at the .01 level were examined for potential unfairness. This study employed archival data from the sample of the Nonverbal subtests of the Standardization edition of the SB5. The stratification variables were age, sex, and race/ethnicity, matched to census percentages. Participants were ages 4-17 years and included 17 Latinas/o living in the U.S. four years or less, 20 Latinas/os living in the U.S. five years or more, and 100 Caucasian/White Non-Hispanics. Out of the 223 analyses of variance, two items were significant at the .01 level, and one was significant at the .05 level. No significant differences were found on testlet scores, factor scores, or domain scores. These limited findings of DIF favor each group on different items, balancing one another out and thus nullifying the overall bias hypothesis. The results of this study suggest that there is little evidence of item bias on the SB5 Nonverbal scale between children and adolescents who are from a Latin country regardless of time in U.S. and Caucasian/White Non-Hispanic children with comparable ages, genders, and socioeconomic status taken from the normative sample of the Standardization edition of the SB5.

 
AdviserRodger Bufford
SchoolGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 73-02, p. , Dec 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational tests & measurements; Educational psychology
Publication Number3485301
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3485301
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.