Predicting North Carolina third grade End-of-Grade Test of Reading Comprehension scores from first, second, and third grade variables
by Knuth, Sean B., Ph.D., THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL, 2011, 104 pages; 3477474

Abstract:

A significant body of research exists on the development of early literacy skills and their relationship to the development of literacy as a whole. Phonological awareness, orthographic processing, rapid automatized naming, phonological memory, and receptive vocabulary have all been shown to be predictive of early reading outcome measures. What is unknown, however, is whether or not these variables are predictive of the North Carolina third grade End of Grade Test of Reading Comprehension, a major outcome measure used in North Carolina to determine student, teacher, school, and district academic performance.

This study addressed the following research questions: (1) Do the variables identified through a review of the literature as being predictors of reading achievement in first, second, and third grade contribute to scores on the reading EOG? (2) Does growth on measures of these variables, identified through a review of the literature as being predictors of reading achievement in first, second, and third grade contribute to scores on the reading EOG?

Linear regressions were conducted on data consisting of 111 children. After controlling for age, IQ, and inherent characteristics of the data set, five predictor variables in grades one, two, and three were found to be significantly predictive of the outcome measure. A significant portion of variance was accounted for by receptive vocabulary at time point one; phonological awareness, RAN and receptive vocabulary at time point two; and orthographic processing and RAN at time point three. Further examination indicated phonological awareness and RAN were most predictive and time point two and orthographic processing was most predictive at time point three. Phonological memory was never significantly predictive at any given time point but contributed the most to outcome measure prediction at time point two.

Findings suggest scores on the reading EOG are predicted by a child's development on skills key to the development of early literacy. An individual's literacy skills can be used to estimate later performance on this high stakes test of reading ability. The results of this study suggest students can be screened for potential EOG failure and interventions can be implemented to remediate key skills. This study also suggests a model for the evaluation of other high stakes outcome measures.

 
AdvisersSteve E. Knotek; Stephen R. Hooper
SchoolTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL
SourceDAI/A 73-01, p. , Nov 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational tests & measurements; Educational evaluation; Educational psychology
Publication Number3477474
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3477474
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.