Professional development in North Carolina public schools: Analysis of administrative participation in high school Professional Learning Communities
by Grant, Carlos Christopher, Ed.D., THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE, 2011, 99 pages; 3475995

Abstract:

The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction has focused efforts on improving student achievement through teacher development. There is evidence that school systems have been using ineffective professional development which has resulted in unsatisfactory gains in student achievement. Professional Learning Communities (PLC) with administrative participation is suggested as a structure to facilitate professional development for teachers. The purpose of this study was to use quantitative research to analyze the effects of administrative participation in PLCs and teacher's perceived effectiveness on student achievement. The research questions addressed whether there was a significant difference between teacher perceptions of effectiveness among PLCs that have administrative participation and PLCs that do not, as measured by the Learning Organization Survey (LOS). Additionally, significant difference among PLCs with or without administrative participation was determined. Three high schools having five 5-person PLC groups (N=75) were studied. The control group included a school without a PLC structure. The two treatment groups were schools with PLCs, one with administrative participation and one without. Each group was given the pre- and post tested using the LOS. Independent t-tests of the post-test and dependent t-tests revealed a more significantly positive score about administrative involvement in PLCs (N=75, p=.001) than the control group. Results from this study support the need for PLCs as the primary focus in professional development for schools to accomplishing Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) goals set by North Carolina Department of Instruction (2009).

 
AdviserJames E. Lyons
SchoolTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE
SourceDAI/A 72-12, p. , Oct 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational administration; Teacher education; Secondary education
Publication Number3475995
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3475995
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.