Do words harm? The perceptions and attitudes of African American college students to hate speech
by Murray, Rodney, Ph.D., CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, 2011, 115 pages; 3475188

Abstract:

This study is about how individuals perceive words that are intended to humiliate, and degrade. The foundation of this study is based on research that suggests hate speech can cause harm to the targets of racial epithets and slurs. The theoretical framework for this study is based on Social Identity Theory. In social identity theory, a person has not merely one personal self, but several selves, which correspond to widening circles of group membership. At the core of the hate-speech issue is the moral effects that hateful expressions are demeaning and insensitive and have conscious and unconscious effects on the individuals who experience them. Most communication responses and perceptions are mediated by an individual’s past experiences, as well as by their psychological and emotional states. This study compares African American college students who have experienced hate speech to those who have not experienced hate speech in order to determine what their perceptions and attitudes are regarding hate speech. The study hypothesizes that African American college students who have experienced hate speech will have more negative perceptions and attitudes toward hate speech than will African American college students who have not experienced hate speech. The study also hypothesizes that African American college students with greater commitment toward their ethnic identity will attribute more harm to hate speech than those with lower commitment in their ethnic identity. The proposed study is quantitative, and the research design for determining the effects of hate speech as an environmental variable is the ex post facto design.

 
AdviserJennifier Rounds-Bryant
SchoolCAPELLA UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 73-01, p. , Nov 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsAfrican American studies; Black studies; Communication; Sociology; Criminology
Publication Number3475188
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» This is an open access dissertation.
  Use the link below to access the full text PDF of this graduate work:
  http://gradworks.umi.com/3475188.pdf
  Use the link below to search and retrieve all open access dissertations:
  http://pqdtopen.proquest.com

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.