White racial identity, friendship group diversity, and multicultural tolerance as predictors of white college students' interpersonal adjustment
by Brigatti, Ludovica Cecilia Maria, Ph.D., FORDHAM UNIVERSITY, 2011, 102 pages; 3475171

Abstract:

This study empirically examined the predictive power of White racial identity, racial diversity of friendship group, and multicultural tolerance on interpersonal adjustment of White college students. The sample was comprised of 125 White students attending an urban university with a racially diverse student body reflective of national race demographics. Participants were asked to complete a demographic questionnaire, the White Racial Consciousness Development Scale-Revised (WRCDS-R), the Quick Discrimination Index (QDI), a Friendship Group Diversity Questionnaire, and the Student Developmental Task and Lifestyle Assessment (SDTLA). Pearson product-moment correlations provided insight into the relationships among the study variables and a hierarchical regression was conducted to investigate the research hypotheses.

Statistically significant correlations were found between the independent variables (White racial identity, multicultural tolerance, and friendship group diversity) and the dependent variable (interpersonal adjustment), which is consistent with previous research. The results of the hierarchical regression indicated that the overall model of multicultural tolerance, friendship group diversity, and White racial identity was a statistically significant predictor of interpersonal adjustment. Multicultural tolerance and White racial identity were statistically significant predictors of interpersonal adjustment, with White racial identity accounting for additional significant variance above and beyond the other variables. Friendship group diversity was not found to be a statistically significant predictor of interpersonal adjustment.

Results of the study underscore the importance of racial identity and multicultural tolerance in White students’ psychosocial development. Empirical and practical implications of the study, limitations, and future research are discussed.

 
AdviserGiselle B. Esquivel
SchoolFORDHAM UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 73-01, p. , Nov 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsBehavioral sciences; Social psychology
Publication Number3475171
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3475171
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.