Enhancing student engagement using online, asynchronous, reflective discussions
by Dolan, Dallas M., D.Ed., CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, 2011, 76 pages; 3474276

Abstract:

Student engagement in college classes, which is critical for student success, has been positively correlated with overall student success, including persistence and retention rates (Ouimet, 2001, Assessment Measures: The Community College Survey of Student Engagement); critical thinking; and grade point average (Carini, Kuh, & Klein, 2006, Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages). Based upon social constructivist theory and informed by the literature on communities of practice, reflective learning, and online learning, this quasi-experimental study was designed to examine the impact of the use of online, asynchronous, reflective discussions (OARDs) on student engagement in traditional, face-to-face college classes, as well as the influence of student age on engagement. Two hundred and eighteen students enrolled in first-year, face-to-face psychology classes at a large community college in the northeastern part of the United States participated in the study. Half of the students were enrolled in first-year psychology classes in which OARDs were used, and the other half were enrolled in similar psychology classes in which OARDs were not used. No statistically significant differences were found in student engagement when comparing the students participating in OARDs and those not participating in OARDs. However, a statistically significant difference was found in engagement scores of students in the 26- to 34-year-old group when compared to their younger counterparts in the 18- to 25-year-old group, regardless of their participation in the traditional or the OARD-enhanced classes. Several possibilities for these findings were explored, and recommendations for future research were made.

 
AdviserCaroline Bassett
SchoolCAPELLA UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 72-12, p. , Oct 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsCommunity college education; Pedagogy; Educational technology
Publication Number3474276
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3474276
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.