Factors Leading to Human Error in Commercial Aviation Line Maintenance
by Froslee, Hans Michael, Ph.D., WALDEN UNIVERSITY, 2011, 133 pages; 3473400

Abstract:

Since World War II, commercial aviation, in partnership with aircraft manufacturers and regulatory agencies, has endeavored to promote safety by increasing system reliability. This effort has fostered a learning culture in the industry, moving many carriers toward becoming a high reliability organization (HRO). A core HRO characteristic is a preoccupation with detecting conditions leading to system failure. The Federal Aviation Administration, in partnership with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, established the Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) to provide a vehicle for personnel to self-report safety concerns. This study examined 361 ASRS cases voluntarily reported by maintainers from 2002 to 2007. The Human Factors Analysis Classification System-Maintenance Extension (HFACS-ME) was used to code conditions that can precipitate failures in pre- and postflight servicing, planned maintenance, and unplanned maintenance. The findings identified 4 specific latent conditions, or 15% of those provided by HFACS-ME, that can affect maintenance: adverse mental state, inadequate training or preparation, inadequate communication, and inadequate assertiveness. The results showed how these four conditions make up 66% of the factors influencing error on the flight line. These results may be used for commercial aviation maintenance to increase maintainer awareness of conditions leading to maintenance error. This awareness can promote the safety refinement of specific human intervention patterns through self-realization by line maintenance personnel. Implications for positive social change include improving workforce awareness of latent conditions that could lead to improved commercial aviation safety.

 
AdviserJohn Schmidt
SchoolWALDEN UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 72-12, p. , Oct 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsOccupational psychology; Organization theory; Organizational behavior
Publication Number3473400
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3473400
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.