One man show: Poiesis and genesis in the Iliad and Odyssey
by Kretler, Katherine L., Ph.D., THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, 2011, 467 pages; 3472886

Abstract:

In this dissertation I demonstrate the virtues of the Homeric poems as scripts for solo performance. To do so I analyze the poems into two separate axes, poiesis and genesis, and show how they are intertwined. Poiesis is the selection and assembly of line, theme, image, speech, episode, or architectonic structure. Genesis is the actualization and circulation of all of this among the poet/performer (bard), hero, audience.

Chapters 1 and 2 give a fresh interpretation of Plato's and Aristotle's treatment of Homeric examples and their imitations of Homer. Plato's dramatic responses to Homer in the Republic and Ion bring into relief the “manyness” of the bard: not only the Protean “becoming” many characters but also a “layering” of presence. Aristotle shows that the bard's performance mode is not an attenuation of dramatic acting but central to the thaumaston, the wondrous, in epic, its “out-of-place” nature (atopia). In Chapter 3 I survey the range of means, from the fully embodied to the fully textual, by which the Homeric script produces atopia and wonder at the source of action. The speech of Phoenix in Iliad 9 (Chapter 4) deploys ring composition, spatial imagery, and a (previously undetected) background myth to produce the uncanny takeover of one character by another. In the opening of Iliad 16 (Chapter 5), another neglected background story invades the plot, and its themes (resurrection, ghosts, the split soul) reinforce the effect that the action is unfolding on more than one plane at once. In Chapter 6 I show how in Odyssey 13 and 14 the bard stages the homecoming of Odysseus by bringing him forward to compose the Cretan Tales out of surrounding objects, traditional stories, and his own inner fears. He merges with one character (Odysseus) only to reveal another (Eumaeus) as a more deeply embedded presence. Two “poiesis interludes” explicate the structural role of background stories brought to light in Chapters 4 and 5. Appendices A and B review external evidence for Homeric performance and explore the role of a staff as a prop.

 
AdviserJames M. Redfield
SchoolTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
SourceDAI/A 72-11, p. , Oct 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsClassical literature; Theater history
Publication Number3472886
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3472886
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.