An analysis of the doctrine of justification in the theologies of Richard Baxter and Benjamin Keach
by Hicks, Thomas Eugene, Jr., Ph.D., THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, 2009, 200 pages; 3467788

Abstract:

This dissertation shows that two fundamentally different philosophical, theological, and practical systems supported and expressed the doctrine of justification in the theologies of Richard Baxter and Benjamin Keach. Chapter 1 provides a general introduction to the topic, describing the historical setting of the debate between Baxter and Keach.

Chapter 2 provides biographical summaries of Richard Baxter and Benjamin Keach. Both had to endure persecution at the hands of the English government. Neither man had any formal theological training, but both men were committed pastors who labored in their callings to shepherd Christ's church through careful reflection upon and application of Holy Scripture.

Chapter 3 summarizes Richard Baxter's doctrine of justification by examining seven of his most important works on the topic. Operating on a nominalist paradigm, Baxter assumed that God may justly declare an unholy act to be holy in justification. Baxter viewed the covenant of grace as holding out the promise of justification and eternal life on the condition of keeping the "mild law" of the covenant. Practically, Baxter believed that believers should be motivated by fear of failing to attain final justification and eternal life.

Chapter 4 is a summary of Benjamin Keach's doctrine of justification. Keach operated on the assumptions of philosophical realist, believing that God cannot justly change his law to make it easier for fallen sinners to obey. Keach's theological method was rooted in federal theology's doctrine that Christ merited the justification of the elect by means of the intra-Trinitarian covenant of grace. Keach's doctrine of justification was foundational to his entire pastoral theology and approach to preaching and motivating sinners to live godly lives.

Chapter 5 compares, contrasts, and analyzes the systems of Baxter and Keach. The chapter analyzes their respective underlying presuppositions (philosophies), theological frameworks, and practical implications. It demonstrates the root differences between the two systems.

 
AdviserThomas J. Nettles
SchoolTHE SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
SourceDAI/A 72-10, p. , Sep 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsReligious history; Theology
Publication Number3467788
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3467788
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.