A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of training formats preferred by school personnel
by Means, Cassandra J., Ph.D., CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, 2011, 139 pages; 3465414

Abstract:

In this quantitative multimethod nonexperimental study, the effectiveness of training formats preferred by school personnel was investigated. Data on the training formats preferred by personnel in public schools located in two South Atlantic states were obtained using a Likert scale survey. The survey was a modified version of the Alternative Educators survey (AES) developed by Davis and Lee (2003). The modified version, the Public Educator survey (PES), was used to gather demographic information, educational and professional development experience, the perceived adequacy of formal preservice and inservice training, preference of training method or delivery, perceived current training needs, level of interest in participating in training services, and perception of training formats regarding preference and perceived level of competence. Although collaborative learning was rated as the preferred training format by school personnel, it was found to have a medium effect (d = .64) when it comes to learning transfer. Seminar classes, which were the least preferred method when compared to collaborative learning and conference, had greater than anticipated results. The original expectation was that seminar classes would have a small effect. However, it was found that seminar classes have a large effect (d = 3.95) when it comes to learning transfer. It was concluded that school personnel prefer a collaborative learning training format even though the method is not the most effective for learning transfer.

 
AdviserCarlos L.M. Contreras
SchoolCAPELLA UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 72-10, p. , Aug 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational psychology; Curriculum development
Publication Number3465414
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3465414
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.