Uses and Perceptions of E-mail for Course-Related Communication Between Business Faculty and Undergraduates
by Costello, Robert, Ed.D., JOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY, 2011, 146 pages; 3464879

Abstract:

Technological advancements have facilitated the learning process by offering faculty members and students better access to resources, while increasing the potential for more interaction and communication flexibility (Firmin & Miller, 2005). Among these technologies is electronic mail or e-mail. The uses and perceptions of e-mail between business faculty members and students are essential to improving this ubiquitous form of communication, thus making these issues worthy of investigating.

This study examined whether business faculty and undergraduate business majors were aligned in their perceptions of e-mail exchanges, taking into account their motivations and expectations and their reliance on this form of communication. Another study reported that faculty members perceived e-mail as both a benefit and a liability, and that institutional differences were found in students' motives when corresponding with faculty members via e-mail (Duran, Kelly, & Keaten, 2005).

A mixed-method, sequential exploratory method was used for the study with qualitative data collected through faculty and student focus groups (N = 4, N = 8) and quantitative data collected from faculty and student questionnaires (N = 24, N = 114). The study site was the school of business at a private, Catholic, four-year, liberal arts college in the Northeast. Data analyses employed identification of themes from the focus groups discussions and for the questionnaire data, descriptive statistics and t-tests to determine the significance of between-group differences.

The results confirmed that both business faculty members and undergraduate business majors preferred and most commonly used e-mail for out-of-class communication, and that frequency of use was nearly equal between the two groups. However, disparities did arise concerning message content and format, use of handheld devices, and the value of instruction in the procedures for using e-mail properly.

 
AdviserCynthia V. L. Ward
SchoolJOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 72-11, p. , Sep 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational leadership; Communication; Educational technology
Publication Number3464879
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3464879
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.