The production of reusable learning objects in Chinese culinary arts online instruction using the ADDIE instructional design model
by Wang, Paohsi, Ph.D., IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY, 2011, 278 pages; 3464521

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to analyze, design, develop, implement, and evaluate an online instructional sequence in a culinary arts program. In order to examine the effect on learner knowledge and resulting performance, a series of researcher-created RLOs for Chinese food cultural history and three different Chinese culinary cooking methods were utilized. This study also examined the learners' attitudes toward this instruction using an online delivery system compared to similar instruction in a more traditional face-to-face method.

Six RLO modules with content and teaching materials were developed based on a Delphi Technique evaluation process and suggestions from SMEs and IDEs. A modified quasi-experimental, nonequivalent control-group design was used in this study. The participants of this proposed research were enrolled in the courses entitled CUAR 1110: Culinary Foundations I, and CUAR 1111: Culinary Skill Development I at a southeastern Idaho university. There were two class sections with one section serving as the experimental group (online) and the other as the control group (face-to-face). The experimental group was conducted using the Moodle learning management system, while the control group attended a traditional face-to-face class; the instructional treatment period was three weeks.

Results from the data analysis revealed no significant difference in student attitude toward Chinese culinary arts and knowledge of Chinese culinary cooking methods between the two groups. However, the results of this study provided evidence that students' attitudes and knowledge of Chinese culinary arts were increased in both the experimental (online) and control (face-to-face) groups. An independent t- test was used to analyze the performance posttest scores; results indicated there was no statistically significant difference in the two groups.

 
AdviserJane Strickland
SchoolIDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 72-10, p. , Aug 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsHome economics education; Educational technology; Curriculum development
Publication Number3464521
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3464521
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.