An examination of the Taiwanese government cross-straits educational barriers
by Chow, Nathan C., D.P.A., UNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE, 2011, 191 pages; 3455636

Abstract:

Purpose. The purpose of the study was to explore the Taiwanese policy of allowing Mainland Chinese students to study at Taiwan universities. Since China still officially regards Taiwan as an “rebellious province,” this new policy has become very difficult for public policymakers to formulate.

Theoretical framework. The theoretical foundations for this study were based on the research foundations of institutional rational choice theory, institutional analysis and development theory, multiple streams theory, and punctuated-equilibrium theory.

Methodology. A qualitative method using interviews and questionnaires was used. In-depth interviews and questionnaires were conducted with legislators from Taiwan's parliament, determined by their availability.

Major findings. This study found that the legislative results for the policy did not match the expectations of most stakeholders. The resultant policy basically negated any economic effect of an open-door policy to Chinese students. It also will potentially increase administrative costs for universities accepting Chinese students. Findings in regard to most ruling party legislators indicated that most of them were confused about their party's stance and were hesitant about the social and economic values of the policy. Findings in regard to most opposition party legislators indicate that they are against anything Chinese, so have very little room to compromise.

Conclusions. The policy is a very small step toward liberalization in cross-straits educational relations, but leaves much room for improvement. One conclusion is that the Ministry of Education will have to use its administrative powers to alter the policy in many ways to make it more effective. The key conclusion from the study is that Taiwan universities will continue to increase enrollment through exchange students, instead of using the guidelines set forth in the new policy.

 
Advisor
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE
SourceDAI/A 72-07, p. , Jun 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducation policy; Public administration; Public policy
Publication Number3455636
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3455636
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.