Referring to God: Whom do Christians worship and what do Muslims talk about?
by Grace, Justin, Ph.D., SOUTHWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, 2011, 183 pages; 3455623

Abstract:

This dissertation argues that Christians worship a different God than Muslims. In particular, Christians worship the Trinity, whereas Muslims worship the non-triune God.

Chapter 1 begins the discussion of reference and explains why this topic is important.

Chapter 2 discusses the distinction between semantics and pragmatics. Furthermore, this chapter argues for the position that we can examine a sentence without knowing the utterer's particular intentions.

Chapter 3 argues for the neo-Millian view of reference over descriptivist notions of reference. Furthermore, this chapter argues that ‘Jesus Christ’ has semantic content which asserts a Trinitarian proposition.

Chapter 4 argues that descriptions function semantically like quantifiers. However, descriptions have pragmatic content which rely upon speaker intentions. This is important because ‘there is no God but God...’ is a description. Therefore, the phrase ‘there is no God but God...’ isn't a referring phrase.

Chapter 5 argues that ‘God’ is a general term. More specifically, it appears that Christians who accept the Nicene Creed are committed to the view that ‘God’ isn't a proper name. If God were a proper name, then Modalism becomes a more tenable view.

Chapter 6 analyzes the statements ‘Jesus is Lord’ and ‘there is no God but God, and Mohammed is his messenger.’ The purpose of the analysis is to determine whether the referent of ‘God’ in the sentence ‘I worship God’ is the same for Christians and Muslims or different. Since Muslims believe in the non-triune God and Christians believe in the Triune-God, I argue that it's uncharitable to attribute worship of the Trinity to Muslims on the basis of the law of noncontradiction. I conclude that Christians and Muslims worship different objects.

Chapter 7 argues that Muslims worship a fictional object. I argue in this chapter that fictional objects are abstract objects. Furthermore, abstract objects exist in some real sense.

Chapter 8 is the conclusion and a summary is provided of the argument made in my dissertation.

 
AdviserGreg Welty
SchoolSOUTHWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
SourceDAI/A 72-07, p. , Jun 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsLinguistics; Philosophy; Theology
Publication Number3455623
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3455623
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.