Applicant self-selection during the hiring process: Developing and testing a model of applicant withdrawal
by Giumetti, Gary W., Ph.D., CLEMSON UNIVERSITY, 2011, 174 pages; 3454929

Abstract:

Applicant withdrawal behavior is of considerable interest to organizations and selection system designers. Some of the primary reasons for this interest are that applicant decisions to withdraw from a selection procedure can impact the size and quality of the applicant pool (Barber & Roehling, 1993), which can decrease the utility of the selection procedure (Murphy, 1986) and increase the potential for adverse impact (Ryan, Sacco, McFarland, & Kriska, 2000; Tam, Murphy, & Lyall, 2004). The current study builds a model of applicant withdrawal based on prior theoretical and empirical work and subsequently tests components of this model. The proposed predictors of withdrawal intentions and behavior include applicant perceptions, motivation, selection process features, employment background characteristics, and individual differences.

Data were collected from ∼ 25,000 applicants to a large manufacturing start-up company in the US at four time points in the selection process—application, post-test, post-assessment, and post-interview. Results from linear and logistic regression analyses provided support for the proposed model of applicant withdrawal, highlighting the importance of both applicant perceptions and contextual features.

More specifically, the study found that perceptions of Person-Job (P-J) and Person-Organization (P-O) fit as well as perceptions of offer expectancy were among the strongest predictors of withdrawal intentions. Withdrawal behavior was more difficult to predict, but was significantly predicted by current employment status, demographic characteristics, number of previous jobs held, P-O fit perceptions, and withdrawal intentions.

Implications of the study's results for organizations and selection system designers are discussed within the limitations of the current research. Additionally, directions for future research are detailed within a broader framework of applicant withdrawal.

 
AdviserPatrick H. Raymark
SchoolCLEMSON UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 72-08, p. , Jun 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsOccupational psychology; Organizational behavior
Publication Number3454929
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3454929
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.