Evaluating body modification as a social stigma: Using Latent Class Analysis to determine dimensions of stigmatization
by DiPopolo, Julie, Ph.D., FORDHAM UNIVERSITY, 2010, 175 pages; 3452807

Abstract:

Individuals with body modifications are members of a stigmatized group, however research does not suggest how individuals with different body modifications may differ in relation to dimensions of stigmatization and resulting perceived discrimination The current study surveyed members of an online body modification community about their current modifications and compared Latent Class Analysis (LCA) and Principal Components Analysis (PCA) results on the items in four samples: individuals with piercings only, tattoos only, piercings and tattoos, and all individuals combined. Results of both the LCA and PCA suggest that it is not necessary to evaluate these samples separately, and the entire sample can used to represent these individuals. The LCA results also provided more useful and interpretable groups than the PCA. LCA for the entire sample found three classes of individuals: those with visible tattoos and few piercings, those with visible piercings and few tattoos, and those with few modifications in general. These groups were significantly different on dimensions of stigmatization (visibility, commonness, and threatening nature), and showed expected relationships with perceived discrimination (i.e., the more stigmatized dimensions also showed more perceived discrimination). These classes can be used in future research to determine the most representative items of each class, create groups for experimental designs, investigate experiences of discrimination unique to these classes, or extend this research to other types of body modifications.

 
AdviserTiffany Yip
SchoolFORDHAM UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 72-07, p. , May 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsSocial psychology; Quantitative psychology and psychometrics
Publication Number3452807
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3452807
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.