Application of protection motivation theory to study the factors that influence disaster recovery planning: An empirical investigation
by Wunnava, Shalini, D.B.A., LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY, 2011, 99 pages; 3451090

Abstract:

In today's information intensive and networked world, Disaster Recovery Planning (DRP) is a critical and significant activity. However, DRP does not always receive the attention it deserves. Therefore, it is critical to examine the factors that influence the undertaking of disaster recovery planning. A model on disaster recovery planning was developed using the theoretical lens of Protection Motivation Theory (PMT). Drawing from PMT literature and using the information technology disaster recovery planning (ITDRP) construct developed by Shropshire and Kadlec (2009), a research model was developed in which perceived severity, perceived vulnerability, intrinsic rewards, extrinsic rewards, fear, response efficacy, self-efficacy, and response costs are the determinants of ITDRP. The results of an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) indicated issues of conceptual overlap of items of perceived severity with other factors and therefore, the variable perceived severity was dropped from the model. Based on a Principal Components Analysis (PCA), the items of ITDRP were consolidated into three factors: (1) identification, recovery, and back-up procedures; (2) procedures for the DRP plan, human resources, and physical facilities; and (3) offsite storage. Three regression models were formed with these three factors as the dependent variables. The regression results showed that self-efficacy and response costs were significant and consistent predictors of ITDRP. These results are consistent with previous studies that used PMT in other contexts.

 
AdvisersT. Sellwyn Ellis; Tom L. Roberts
SchoolLOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 72-06, p. , Apr 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsInformation technology; Organizational behavior; Information science
Publication Number3451090
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3451090
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.