The bankers' facade: Conceptual metaphors of bank CEOs during financial crisis
by Vignone, Mary Jean, Ph.D., FIELDING GRADUATE UNIVERSITY, 2011, 154 pages; 3449709

Abstract:

Conceptual metaphor theory promotes the view that metaphors are first cognitive, then expressed in language. In this study, an analysis of the conceptual metaphors of four bank executives from Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley was conducted. Specifically, this investigation looked at how these executives framed their roles in the financial system.

Particular attention was placed on how the bank executives delivered their ‘facework’ (public personas) during a period of politically charged and challenging events at two separate hearings: the Congressional Committee on Financial Services Hearing: TARP Accountability: Use of Federal Assistance by the First TARP Recipients held on February 11, 2009 and The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission: First Public Hearing, Day 1 held on January 13, 2010.

The research methodology developed was a combination of Lakoff and Johnson’s conceptual metaphor analysis, Charteris-Black’s critical metaphor analysis, and Rohrer’s method of conceptual domain mapping. The resulting research method helped to minimize the subjective nature of conceptual metaphor analysis and provided a systematic approach to metaphor identification to mitigate the risk of researcher bias. An inter-rater reliability study was also incorporated into the methodology.

The analysis revealed a system of metaphors that was quite consistent across speakers and across hearings. The identified metaphorical system was a complex interrelationship among four different conceptual metaphors and conceptual keys: ECONOMIC BUILDING, FINANCIAL PROBLEMS ARE NATURAL DISASTERS, TARP IS A TEMPORARY SHELTER, and KNOWING IS SEEING. The metaphorical system proposed implies that bank executives deflected any blame for the 2008–2009 financial crisis through the use of the metaphor of an ACT OF GOD. The findings of this research present a better understanding of linguistic strategies that executives used to position their companies while under public scrutiny.

Keywords: conceptual metaphors, critical metaphor analysis, financial crisis, TARP, House Committee on Financial Services, Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, bank executives

 
AdviserPlacida V. Gallegos
SchoolFIELDING GRADUATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 72-06, p. , May 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsManagement; Rhetoric; Organizational behavior; Banking
Publication Number3449709
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3449709
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.