The diagnostic efficacy of the child behavior checklist and youth self-report in outpatient youth ages 6 to 18
by Ouellette, Claude E., Ph.D., CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, 2011, 141 pages; 3449131

Abstract:

This research evaluates the diagnostic efficacy of selected Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL; Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001) and Youth Self-Report (YSR; Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001) scales in an outpatient setting. One hundred and eighty-one children and adolescents ages 6 to 18 completed the CBCL and YSR measures with participants grouped according to their Axis I diagnosis. A board-certified psychiatrist, other than the researcher, assigned diagnoses. Results from positive predictive power (PPP), negative predictive power (NPP), sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) showed no differences between youth diagnosed with single Axis I depressive disorders and depressed co-disordered or anxious youth. Depressed co-disordered and anxious youth obtained significant results on the CBCL Somatic Complaints (AUC = 0.632, p < .001), Withdrawn/Depressed (AUC = 0.594, p < .01), and YSR Externalizing (AUC = 0.619, p < .01) scales. Depressed co-disordered youth obtained high PPP rates, varying from 71% to 92% on the CBCL, and from 69% to 90% on the YSR. Sensitivity rates varied between 62% of correct classification with the CBCL Somatic Complaints scale, and 93% on the YSR Internalizing scale. Anxious youth obtained similar results with correct classification rates of 50% (PPP) for both CBCL and YSR scales. Diagnostic accuracy, that is sensitivity, reached 99% on the CBCL Externalizing scale, and 98% on the YSR Anxious/Depressed scale. These results indicated good diagnostic efficacy for the CBCL and YSR. Results further showed that symptom overlap and variations in symptoms negatively influenced the diagnostic efficacy of both CBCL and YSR in predicting Axis I disorders.

 
AdviserMarilyn Marks-Frey
SchoolCAPELLA UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 72-06, p. , Apr 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsClinical psychology; Quantitative psychology and psychometrics
Publication Number3449131
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» This is an open access dissertation.
  Use the link below to access the full text PDF of this graduate work:
  http://gradworks.umi.com/3449131.pdf
  Use the link below to search and retrieve all open access dissertations:
  http://pqdtopen.proquest.com

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.