A conflict management model for architectural design collaboration
by Serag-Eldin, Gamil M., Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, 2010, 78 pages; 3449071

Abstract:

Until recently the design of a building was carried out only by an architect. The architect maintained enough knowledge of buildings, in addition to knowledge of the social, religious and other aspects of his society, that allowed him to complete a building design. The entire building project was his sole creation.

However, the design of buildings today is no longer a one-person operation, because the complexity of a large-scale design and construction exceeds the capacity of any single human’s abilities. As we introduce new technologies, materials, and methodologies into building design, we draw on more and more knowledge from disciplines other than architecture and structural engineering. Designing buildings has become an exercise of multi-disciplinary teamwork.

Multi-disciplinary collaboration is a complex task. It is especially difficult when design solutions need to be shared and evaluated by participants who represent different professional views of the project. A design solution generated by one participant may satisfy certain requirements and evaluation criteria, but might be contradictory to the goals or values of another participant. The differences signify the domain-expertise each discipline possesses, which is why they were assembled for the purposes of completing the project in the first place. Conflicts among these participants are inevitable, and must be resolved to reach a comprehensive design solution.

This dissertation presents a comprehensive approach to negotiation and conflict management in architectural and building design. A primary objective of this research is to define conflict and provide analysis and understanding of its nature. Another objective is to develop a computational model of conflict management and negotiation strategies. To these ends, I developed SWAY a conceptual model that provides a set of conflict resolution algorithms that deal with situations and patterns of a conflict. The model allows designers from various disciplines to avoid conflict if possible and deal with inevitable conflicts in manners that improve the overall quality of the design. The dissertation also aims at enhancing the collaboration process among participants, which result in improving design quality and minimizing delays expenses.

 
AdviserYehuda E. Kalay
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
SourceDAI/A 72-06, p. , Apr 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsArchitecture; Artificial intelligence; Computer science
Publication Number3449071
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3449071
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.