Psychometric Properties of Characteristics of Teacher Professional Development Instrument
by Soine, Karen M., Ed.D., SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY, 2011, 203 pages; 3447077

Abstract:

This primary purpose of the study was to expand the work of Garet, Porter, Desimone, Birman, and Yoon (2001) by creating and psychometrically testing an instrument designed to measure teachers' perceptions of characteristics of professional development. Elementary teachers (n = 406) from five school districts in Washington State participating in a school improvement initiative completed the survey (51% response rate). Results of an exploratory factor analysis (PCA with oblimin rotation) resulted in a five component solution: (a) Collective Participation, (b) Focus on Teachers' Content Knowledge and How Students Learn Content, (c) Coherence with Teachers' Needs and Circumstances, (d) Active Learning in Classroom, and (e) Active Learning Beyond the Classroom. The revised instrument exhibited strong internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from .72 to .94 for each subscale. The aforementioned components differ from the characteristics tested by Garet et al. (2001); most notably items intended to measure Active Learning split into two distinct components. The secondary purpose of the study was to determine if characteristics of effective professional development predicted teachers' use of new knowledge and skills, and student learning outcomes. For the correlational portion of the study, the sample was restricted to elementary teachers in one district involved with the initiative. There was a slight, but significant, correlation between Active Learning in Classroom and teachers' use of new knowledge and skills, as measured by STAR classroom observation scores, rs = .189, p = .049. A small negative correlation emerged between Collective Participation and student learning, as measured by student scores on the state's criterion-based mathematics assessment, rs = −.279, p = .014. The Characteristics of Professional Development instrument demonstrated strong internal consistency and construct validity. More research should be done to determine the predictive validity and potential uses of the resulting instrument.

 
AdviserAndrew T. Lumpe
SchoolSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 72-04, p. , Jun 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsPedagogy; Elementary education; Teacher education; Quantitative psychology and psychometrics
Publication Number3447077
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3447077
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.