Where is the learning in smaller learning communities? Academic press, social support for learning, and academic engagement in smaller learning community classrooms
by Fischer, Christopher Michael, Ph.D., OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY, 2010, 138 pages; 3441922

Abstract:

The extent to which Academic Press and strong social relationships impact Academic Engagement in smaller learning communities (SLCs) situated in large comprehensive urban high schools was investigated. Data were collected through classroom observations, student questionnaires and focus groups with teachers and analyzed using descriptive statistics, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), and content analysis of focus interview transcripts. Findings from the survey data confirm those found in much of the existing literature, namely that students experiencing high levels of Academic Press were more often the most academically engaged. This finding was also confirmed for African American students in high Academic Press math classes. Social Support for Learning was not confirmed as a key factor in Academic Engagement. Descriptive statistics indicated moderate to low levels of Academic Press, Social Support for Learning and Academic Engagement in student self report data and in classroom observations. Results from focus groups of teachers participating in smaller learning communities identified themes suggesting that much of the Academic Press and Social Support for Learning evident in the SLCs examined was attributable to the individual efforts of teachers, sometimes in spite of the SLC structure. Additionally, factors impacting engagement emerged, chief among them being teacher and student rapport and the relevance and complexity of the curriculum. Implications for future practice and directions for further research are also discussed.

 
AdviserLinda Bol
SchoolOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 72-03, p. , Mar 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducation policy; Secondary education
Publication Number3441922
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3441922
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.