"Too Much Information?" How Teacher Self-Disclosure on Facebook Influences Students' Opinions
by Heacock, Corey Ann Raieta, Ed.D., WILMINGTON UNIVERSITY (DELAWARE), 2011, 134 pages; 3439053

Abstract:

The purpose of this quantitative study was to determine if a prospective teacher’s level of self-disclosure on Facebook influenced student opinions in the areas of motivation, affective learning, classroom climate, and teacher credibility. 243 eleventh and twelfth grade students evaluated a Facebook page with either a high, moderate, or low level of self disclosure, and responded to a survey about the depicted teacher. 63% of students enrolled in the eleventh and twelfth grades at the study school responded to the survey. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample and analyze the results. One-way analysis of variance with post hoc analysis was used to determine significant differences between the three groups in the study areas. Statistical analysis revealed that students held lower opinions of a pre-service teacher in the areas of motivation, affective learning, and teacher credibility compared to the moderate and low disclosure groups. There was no significant difference between the low and moderate disclosure groups. Furthermore, there was no significance difference in student opinions related to classroom climate in any of the groups. The findings from this study have major implications for prospective K-12 teachers, currently employed K-12 teachers, universities with teacher preparation programs, and school districts. Social networking technologies are rapidly changing the face of interpersonal communication in the field of education. Educational stakeholders must address these changes in their policies and practice.

 
AdviserPamela M. Curtiss
SchoolWILMINGTON UNIVERSITY (DELAWARE)
SourceDAI/A 72-03, p. , Feb 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational leadership; Communication; Web studies; Educational technology
Publication Number3439053
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3439053
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.