Influences of background information on rapid object recognition in natural scenes
by Sun, Hsin-Mei, Ph.D., NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2010, 71 pages; 3437824

Abstract:

Three experiments were conducted to examine the effects of scene context on rapid object recognition in natural scenes. In Experiment 1, participants performed an animal/nonanimal go/no-go categorization task in which they had to decide whether or not a flashed scene contained an animal. In Experiment 2, participants performed a two-alternative forced choice task in which they had to discriminate animals and vehicles appearing in briefly flashed scenes. In Experiment 3, participants' event-related potentials (ERPs) were measured when they performed an animal/nonanimal go/no-go categorization task. The effect of scene context was manipulated either by maintaining or excluding an object's background information. The behavioral data obtained from Experiments 1-3 showed that the recognition of an object appearing with its original scene background was more accurate and faster than the recognition of an object appearing with a meaningless background, suggesting that scene representations can be extracted rapidly and used to modulate object processing even when an image is presented briefly. Moreover, the ERP data obtained from Experiment 3 showed that the onset latency of the go/no-go ERP difference was delayed for objects appearing without scene backgrounds compared to objects appearing with scene backgrounds, providing direct evidence that scene context facilitates object recognition. Additionally, an increased frontal negativity along with a decreased late positive potential for processing objects presented in meaningless scene backgrounds suggest that the categorization task becomes more demanding when scene context is eliminated. Together, the results of the current study suggest that scene context modulates object processing even when an image is presented briefly.

 
AdviserRobert D. Gordon
SchoolNORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 72-02, p. , Jan 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsPsychobiology; Experimental psychology; Cognitive psychology
Publication Number3437824
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3437824
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.