Effects of pronoun identification instruction on text comprehension for children with autism
by Campbell, Michele A., Psy.D., FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY, 2010, 76 pages; 3435583

Abstract:

This study investigated the effectiveness of direct instruction, in the form of anaphoric cues, on text comprehension skills and pronoun identification skills for ten elementary grade children with autism. A pretest-posttest matched control group design was utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of a ten week reading program on a sample of poor comprehenders, classified as having autism. The study examined the influence of the program between and within groups. It was hypothesized that providing anaphoric cues would increase pronoun identification skills, improve the ability to answer "wh" questions correctly, and improve reading comprehension. It was also hypothesized that the gradual removal of the verbal prompt, would not affect the ability to answer "wh" questions correctly.

The program included bi weekly reading sessions that required students to read sentences and answer "wh" questions. Participants in the intervention group were provided anaphoric cues, during each session. While the control group read the same sentences and answered the same questions, they were not provided any cues. Anaphoric cues consisted of an anaphoric question and textual prompts provided during a reading session, to help the reader identify the correct pronoun referent. Paired t-tests were computed and indicated statistically significant improvement in the ability to answer "wh" questions correctly for students provided cues from baseline to week 10. Standardized instruments found significant improvement in reading comprehension for the intervention group from pre to post intervention. The ability to answer "wh" questions correctly was maintained, after the gradual removal of the verbal prompt. Statistical significant improvement was not found in the ability to identify pronouns for neither the experimental or control group.

 
Advisor
SchoolFAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 72-01, p. , Dec 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational psychology; Special education; Reading instruction
Publication Number3435583
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3435583
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.