Principals and Self-Determination Theory (SDT): What trends are seen in levels of autonomy, competence, and relatedness?
by Roundy-Harter, Anne, Ed.D., CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY, 2010, 113 pages; 3434540

Abstract:

This study builds upon Deci and Ryan’s (1985) Self-Determination Theory (SDT) which states that humans must meet three basic psychological needs for optimal well-being: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore trends in principals’ experiences in the areas of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Research questions include: How do public school principals score in the areas of autonomy, competence, and relatedness? Do principals’ responses vary depending on whether they have been formally coached or not? Do responses vary depending on whether principals are working in Program Improvement (PI) Schools or not? Finally, to what do principals attribute their scores in the areas of autonomy, competence, and relatedness? A 27-item questionnaire based on the Self-Determination at Work scale as developed by Deci and Ryan (1989) was given to 199 eligible principal candidates followed by contact by phone and/or email to arrange interviews. The second phase included eighteen one-on-one interviews with randomly selected participants from within each of four categories: (1) coached/PI, (2) coached/non-PI, (3) not coached/PI, (4) not coached/non-PI, as determined by responses on the questionnaire. All responses were voluntary and participants had the option to decline to respond to items on the questionnaire. Participants were K-12 public school male and female principals from schools within Ventura County. Principals represented a variety of experience levels, and a variety of sites. Elementary, middle, junior high and high schools were represented in the study, including schools that were in Program Improvement and those that were not.

 
AdviserDeborah E. Erickson
SchoolCALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 72-03, p. , Jan 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational leadership; Educational administration; Occupational psychology
Publication Number3434540
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3434540
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.