Influence of learning styles on cognitive presence in an online learning environment
by Maness-Gilliland, Amelia L., Ph.D., CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, 2010, 99 pages; 3433707

Abstract:

This paper describes a quantitative, descriptive research study designed to examine the relationship between learning styles and critical thinking in an online classroom. Using descriptive statistics, research was conducted on an introductory, online course offered by a major online university. Student learning styles served as the independent variable and student scores on the cognitive presence portion of the community of inquiry survey served as the dependent variable. In the final three weeks of the course, participants were asked to complete Kolb's learning style inventory and the cognitive presence portion of the community of inquiry survey. ANOVAs were conducted on each learning style and cognitive presence scores. ANOVAs were also conducted on learning styles and those subsections that define the critical thinking process within the cognitive presence survey. The four subscales of the cognitive presence survey include triggering event, exploration, integration, and resolution. Post hoc tests were run on any significant ANOVAs. The study did not yield enough participants to result in significant findings, 72 participants were needed for the sample size to be sufficient, 56 students responded. Results of the research showed no significant differences on students learning style and scores on the cognitive presence survey. There were no significant differences shown between learning styles and the subscales of cognitive presence with one exception. Students classified as either accommodator and assimilator showed significant differences on the exploration phase of critical thinking as measured by the cognitive presence survey.

 
AdviserLynn Riskedal
SchoolCAPELLA UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 72-02, p. , Jan 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational psychology; Educational technology
Publication Number3433707
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3433707
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.