The Role of Organizational Values in Knowledge Sharing Actions: A Case Study
by Camden, Terry Lee, Ed.D., THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, 2010, 189 pages; 3432899

Abstract:

This case study explored the role of contextual factors in knowledge sharing behaviors with a specific focus on organizational values among these contextual issues. The research examined a local office of a professional services firm offering environmental engineering services to the federal government. To understand how participants perceived contextual and organizational values to influence knowledge sharing, 10 interviews were conducted and supported with document review. An organizational learning lens was used to interpret the interview results. The organizational learning systems model (Schwandt & Marquart, 2000) was used to guide the study. Additionally, interpretations were provided relating to differences around organizational subcultures, interpretations related to knowledge types based on Habermas’ (1971) knowledge dimensions, and interpretations related to Quinn and Rohrbaugh’s (1981) competing values framework.

Participants perceived organizational values such as collaboration, goal congruence, diversity, equality, and excellence as influencing knowledge sharing behaviors. These values differed across organizational subcultures categorized as technical, executive, or administrative. Findings indicated that numerous contextual issues such as personal values, leadership, time and resource constraints, and trust also influenced knowledge sharing behaviors. Interview results also supported that both formal and informal knowledge sharing protocols were relied on, although different categories of participants relied to differing extents on the types of protocols.

When analyzed with respect to knowledge dimensions as categorized by Habermas, findings suggested that participants perceived knowledge sharing behaviors differently for technical knowledge and communicative knowledge. Emancipatory knowledge sharing episodes were not observed. Analysis also indicated that values often conflicted, and although no one particular organizational model was identified with the organization studied, values reflecting a stronger focus on the person rather than the organization and on flexibility rather than control seemed to dominate as influencers of sharing behaviors.

The study increases qualitative empirical data surrounding knowledge sharing and provides insights into the little-explored world of less traditional knowledge dimensions. Additionally, using an organizational learning lens, the study provides insight into the nexus between organizational values and knowledge sharing behaviors.

 
AdviserAndrea J. Casey
SchoolTHE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 72-02, p. , Jan 2011
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsManagement; Organization theory; Organizational behavior
Publication Number3432899
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3432899
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.