Surface and deep level faultlines and network ties in multicultural teams
by Ren, Hong, Ph.D., THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2008, 152 pages; 3431426

Abstract:

This study applies faultline, diversity and network perspectives to understand the functioning of multicultural teams (MCTs). Specifically, this study explores the effects of faultlines on the process and performance of multicultural teams while at the same time taking into account team members’ actual network ties. I propose that different types of faultlines influence team process and performance differently. I particularly examine faultlines based on both cultural values and surface-level attributes (e.g., demographics), as well as faultlines based on both cultural values and deep-level attributes (e.g., differences in beliefs and attitudes). I also examine how network ties that span cultural subgroups created by faultlines influence these same process and outcome variables. A cross-sectional and longitudinal investigation of more than 100 research teams at a major research university provides evidence for a complex pattern of the impact of faultlines and network ties. The results demonstrate that faultlines alone do not contribute to team processes or performance. Instead, their effects depend on the social interaction patterns that cut across them. Specifically, team performance improved when friendship ties cut across subgroups formed by cultural faultlines, but relationship conflict increased and team performance decreased when animosity ties cut across these subgroups. Overall, the results highlighted the importance of taking into account team members’ actual network patterns while studying the effects of team composition on team process and performance. These results generate many fruitful implications for theory and practice. Directions for future research are suggested.

 
AdviserBarbara Gray
SchoolTHE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 71-12, p. , Nov 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsManagement; Organizational behavior
Publication Number3431426
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3431426
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.