Stress levels in male sexual offenders and its relationship to probation type: A study to identify actuarial risk factors
by Bauman, Brooke A., Psy.D., CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, 2010, 102 pages; 3427233

Abstract:

This study examined the effects that stress has on sexual offenders on probation in a South Atlantic metropolitan area. This study used quantitative methodology based upon survey research. The Static-99 (Hanson & Thornton, 1999) was used to assess level of risk, the Adult Manifest Anxiety Scale (Reynolds, Richmond, & Lowe, 2003) was used to measure the total stress score experienced by the participants, and the Life Stressors and Social Resources Inventory (Moos & Moos, 1994) was used to identify particular stress-related factors that may have influenced stress. The sample consisted of 121 male sexual offenders between the ages of 18–80 under the supervision of the state’s Department of Corrections serving either sexual offender probation or regular probation. Descriptive statistics were performed to obtain demographic information. An independent samples t test, a correlation and a multiple regression analysis were conducted to analyze the results. This study found that the sexual offender probation group had higher total stress scores than the regular probation group. The study showed no significant relationship between the sexual offenders’ level of risk and level of stress. This research concluded that there is no significant statistical relationship between the stress-related factors and the total stress scores of the sexual offender probation group. However, when examining the regular probation group there was a statistically significant relationship between the total level of stress score and the finances factor. No other significant statistical relationships were revealed among the remaining stress-related factors and stress scores in the regular probation group.

 
AdviserDavis Henderson
SchoolCAPELLA UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 71-12, p. , Dec 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsClinical psychology; Personality psychology; Criminology
Publication Number3427233
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3427233
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.