Making tracks: Digital recording technology and the democratization of cultural production
by Phillips, William J., Ph.D., NEW YORK UNIVERSITY, 2010, 423 pages; 3426962

Abstract:

This dissertation examines the impact of digital recording technology on the field of music production. Focusing primarily on the shift from analog tape-based systems to software-based hard drive recording systems (also known as digital audio workstations or DAWs), this dissertation investigates the degree to which this shift in technology has impacted the field in the realms of both professional and hobbyist practitioners.

The study finds that the impact of digital technology has been significant in at least two major ways. First, the particular characteristics of digital technology itself, from its ability to provide for endless tracks of recording, to its powerful capabilities for editing and other sonic manipulation, have led to numerous changes in the working practices of recordists, both professional and hobbyist. Second, the much lower costs associated with digital recording systems have significantly lowered the barriers of entry to the field as a whole, and have facilitated an expansion of the field in terms of increased participation. This growth in turn has led to a growth in the market for providing recording-related equipment, as well as facilitating a variety of new smaller-scale economic opportunities and burgeoning cottage industries.

Utilizing a theoretical framework derived from Pierre Bourdieu's field theory, this dissertation is based primarily on qualitative field work, specifically in-depth interviews with recordists at the professional, semi-professional, and hobbyist levels of the field. It also draws upon concepts from Yochai Benkler's work on the networked information economy and Henry Jenkins' work on participatory culture, and ultimately argues that many of the changes in the field of music production can be understood as part of the larger changes in cultural production that have followed from the introduction of digital technologies more generally.

 
AdviserStephen Duncombe
SchoolNEW YORK UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 71-12, p. , Nov 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsCommunication; Mass communication
Publication Number3426962
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3426962
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.