Toward an understanding of the kenosis of Christ: A proposed a priori constituent to transformative leadership traits in Philippians 2:5--11
by Danley, David Atlas, Ph.D., REGENT UNIVERSITY, 2010, 108 pages; 3425736

Abstract:

This research examined the kenosis (self-emptying) of Christ through an exegesis of Philippians 2:5-11, using social and cultural criticism, which is a subtexture of Robbins' (1996a) sociorhetorical interpretation analysis method, to examine Christian religious text. In so doing, this study proposed the construct of the kenosis of Christ to be an a priori constituent to virtue-based transformative leadership principles and traits. To find if this was true, this study examined Philippians 2:5-11 for transformative leadership principles by researching the kenosis of Christ. Although the findings rejected the hypothesis of the research question, transformative leadership traits were found to be present in Philippians 2:5-11 with implications pointing to a mimetic principle supporting Christ as the exemplar model of transformative leadership. Furthermore, because the focus of this study was intentionally narrow (i.e., the exclusive exegesis of Philippians 2:5-11 to discover if virtue-based transformative leadership traits existed in the kenosis of Christ), compulsory limitations were imposed on the extent of the research. Therefore, this study did not engage in theological or Christological debates concerning denominational doctrine or controversies surrounding kenotic dogma. Although this research found that the kenosis of Christ was not a priori to virtue-based transformative leadership traits, its value as a potential step in the transformation process was determined to be viable. In light of these observations, future research is required to further understand Christ's mimetic model of transformation and how Christ's kenosis of self-emptying correlates to virtue-based transformative leadership within organizations.

 
AdviserCorne J. Bekker
SchoolREGENT UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 71-11, p. , Nov 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsBiblical studies; Management; Social structure
Publication Number3425736
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3425736
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.