Designing instruction to match learning style preferences in the online environment: The effect on learner performance
by Koslo, Jennifer L., Ph.D., CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, 2010, 136 pages; 3423817

Abstract:

Advances in the technology available for the design and delivery of online courses, together with the increasingly diverse learning needs of students, have encouraged a stronger focus on instructional design that is more closely aligned to learner requirements and contexts. The 21st century learner is accustomed to acquiring information in a variety of ways and technology can support a learning environment for these digital learners by accommodating differences in individual styles and preferences. Learners have a dominant and several subdominant learning styles they use when studying new information. This pre-experimental study used the Canfield Learning Style Inventory to identify the dominant and subdominant learning styles of 109 students and for creating individualized learning pathways. The effect on performance of following a learning pathway that included the participant's dominant learning style was compared to performance when the learning pathway included the dominant learning style plus one to three subdominant learning styles. Sixty-nine students successfully completed the study and the results showed a statistically significant improvement in test scores following instruction in all four dominant learning style groups. No statistically significant differences were found between the 16 pathways. However, significant academic improvements were found for learners with a dominant learning style of iconic and direct experience when one or more subdominant learning styles were included in the pathway. The findings from this study confirmed that addressing differences in learning styles results in improved test scores; therefore, instructional activities should be created to match a variety of learning style preferences.

 
AdviserCarla Lane
SchoolCAPELLA UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 71-11, p. , Oct 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsInstructional design; Educational technology; Higher education
Publication Number3423817
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3423817
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.