Interactivity Centered Usability Evaluation (ICUE) for course management systems
by Yoon, Sangil, Ph.D., INDIANA UNIVERSITY, 2010, 143 pages; 3423671

Abstract:

ICUE (Interactivity Centered Usability Evaluation) is an enhanced usability testing protocol created by the researcher. ICUE augments the facilitator’s role for usability testing, and offers strategies in developing and presenting usability tasks during a testing session. ICUE was designed to address weaknesses found in the usability evaluation of course management systems (CMSs) with traditional usability testing protocol. The critical interaction between two or more CMS users (e.g., learners, classmates, and instructors) are insufficiently examined with traditional usability testing protocol, as the facilitator is a passive observer and minimizes their interactions with the participant while tasks are attempted. When interactive eLearning activities are not observed during user tests, traditional usability testing protocol can be limited to a technical review of structural and functional elements in a CMS (e.g., interface design, debugging code, and navigation design), resulting in an incomplete evaluation.

ICUE suggests that CMS usability tests should incorporate authentic and interactive eLearning activities as task scenarios. In order to augment traditional usability testing protocol with the ability to observe social interactions in eLearning, the facilitator engages the user through the CMS tools during tasks designed to mimic eLearning activities. The facilitator also strategically modifies the CMS environment during the usability test, which simulates asynchronous activities of a fellow classmate and instructor in an eLearning scenario. In addition to modifying the facilitator’s role in ICUE, usability tasks are designed to be attempted by the user in multiple stages, which also mimics a user’s genuine eLearning experience. ICUE modifications afford an opportunity for evaluators to observe more authentic behaviors during CMS usability tests.

The goal of this inquiry was to offer a proof of concept for the ICUE protocol, in addition to introducing the benefits from ICUE that may inform the development of a prototype to evaluate CMSs. The inquiry’s case study encompassed a usability test, with the application of ICUE on an eLearning program’s CMS. Findings from this authentic testing environment for ICUE, illustrated that traditional usability testing protocol was insufficient in evaluating eLearning activities. Ten out of 34 usability problems from the usability test were attributable to ICUE, and further analysis of these problems, indicated meaningful impacts on CMS design.

Analysis of the usability test report revealed that the application of ICUE resulted in the identification of usability problems that might have gone undetected with traditional usability testing protocol. Although the implementation of ICUE increased the responsibilities of a usability test facilitator, the modifications did not appear to impact the usability test participant’s experience during testing. The benefits of ICUE identified in this instance of CMS usability testing, suggests that additional studies may inform the development of a smarter prototype for evaluation CMS evaluations.

As eLearning approaches evolve from advanced developments in CMSs, or shift to less defined personal learning environments, learners will continue to seek knowledge through technologies that facilitate social interaction. Usability testing techniques should adapt to meet the needs of increasingly complex and interactive eLearning technologies, as user testing can continue to help determine the success or failure of computer systems.

 
AdvisersThomas M. Schwen; Barbara A. Bichelmeyer
SchoolINDIANA UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 71-11, p. , Oct 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsInstructional design; Educational technology; Information science
Publication Number3423671
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3423671
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.