Linking microbial community dynamics to litter and soil chemistry: Understanding the mechanisms of decomposition
by Herman, John E., Ph.D., THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO, 2010, 221 pages; 3423215

Abstract:

The mechanisms of leaf litter decomposition were examined using a combination of modeling and field experimental approaches. First, reported rates of lignin decay (dC3/dt) and holocellulose decay (dC2/dt) were examined in aboveground leaf litter of predominately northern conifer forests to test the hypothesis that the rate of lignin decay is a linear function of the lignocellulose index (LCI = lignin/[holocellulose + lignin]). Simulated dynamics of LCI in decaying litter were highly correlated to observed patterns, particularly when water and ethanol soluble litter fractions from model output were pooled with holocellulose fractions (mean R2 = 0.87 ± 0.02, P < 0.01). More detailed analyses of 64 of these studies yielded variable relationships between lignin decay rate and litter LCI; a regression based on pooled data (N = 385; total number of observations) produced a slope and an intercept that were not significantly different from predicted (slope = 2.33, intercept = -0.93). Both site and litter characteristics had significant effects on the proposed LCI threshold for lignin decay (LCI = 0.4), but no effects on slope or intercept, suggesting that the proposed lignocellulose control hypothesis is relatively robust across a range of litter and forest types.

The next analysis examined reports of microbial biomass associated with decaying plant litter (B:C ratios) in both terrestrial and aquatic systems to test the hypothesis that feedback controls link microbial and litter mass dynamics. Results showed that microbial biomass averaged 2.53% of total system organic matter (microorganisms + litter), but was more than twice as large in aquatic (3.43%, N = 632) as terrestrial (1.05%, N = 384) habitats. The available data were insufficient to either conclusively validate or refute the modeling approach used by Moorhead and Sinsabaugh (2006) to mechanistically link the dynamics of microbial biomass and litter decay. Although the most detailed studies showed an increase in B:C values in early decay, followed by a decline in later stages of decay, similar to model behavior (Moorhead and Sinsabaugh, 2006), data were insufficient and too inconsistent between studies to clearly elucidate any pattern. For these reasons, it is suggested that greater insight to mechanistic linkages between decomposer microbial communities and litter decay will require more detailed studies that simultaneously monitor changes in both microbial and litter characteristics. This study found that combining data from disparate studies, which did not examine these factors consistently, provided only limited insight.

Over a two-year period, litter decaying in the urban, Stranahan Arboretum revealed rapid loss of soluble compounds but little evidence of a faster relative loss of holocellulose than lignin contrary to predictions. Similarly, EEA indicated a seasonal pattern more strongly related to litter moisture than litter chemistry. Although the microbial community demonstrated a clear transition between early and late community types, there was an unexpected increase in diversity for the fungal community. In contrast, litter decaying in the nearby but rural, Oak Openings Metropark followed expected patterns of change in litter chemistry, with holocellulose decaying more rapidly than lignin. Additionally, EEA was strongly related to the soluble litter fraction and litter nitrate concentration, consistent with the conceptual model for a nitrogen limited site. Similar to the Arboretum, there was a clear transition between early and late community types, but with a decline in community diversity. Spring flooding of the Arboretum study site, its position in an urban location and a dense population of exotic earthworms (Amynthas agrestis) are postulated to have affected litter decay, EEA and microbial community patterns. Overall, the results suggest that the current conceptual model for leaf litter decomposition based on single species litter experiments is adequate to address patterns of decay in more natural mixes of leaf litter, given site specific factors. Although the experimental data supported the conceptual model for litter decay, no support was found for either the proposed lignocellulose control or microbial to litter mass (B:C) feedback control hypotheses generated by the GDM (data not shown). The experimental data were likely not of sufficient quantity or resolution to provide a conclusive test for simulated predictions. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

 
AdviserDaryl L. Moorhead
SchoolTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO
SourceDAI/B 71-10, p. , Oct 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEcology; Soil sciences; Environmental science
Publication Number3423215
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3423215
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.