The relationship between oral reading fluency and reading proficiency
by Jones, Kathy S., Ed.D., WALDEN UNIVERSITY, 2010, 168 pages; 3423184

Abstract:

Students who struggle with reading in Grade 3 often fall behind their peers in reading proficiency. Failure to meet minimum reading proficiencies of state-mandated tests can negatively affect children’s success in subsequent grades. Educators have used oral reading fluency tests as reliable indicators of students’ later reading proficiency. Studies in 7 states found that oral reading fluency predicted performance on state reading assessments. One aspect of the automaticity theory was used to explain why struggling readers have insufficient attention to devote to reading proficiently. This nonexperimental, quantitative study investigated whether a statistically significant relationship existed between Grade 3 students’ oral reading fluency rates and their reading proficiency when assessed by the state-mandated assessment. Pearson correlation was used to compare the middle-of-year oral reading fluency rates, measured by the Dynamics Indicators of Basic Literacy Skills oral reading fluency, and reading proficiency, measured by the scale score Grade 3 Reading Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills, of 155 Grade 3 students for the 2008-2009 school year in a school district. The results indicated a relationship between oral reading fluency and reading proficiency. Study results may help elementary school administrators, teachers, and reading specialists to identify at-risk readers and implement interventions to enable students to gain greater reading proficiency and improve their performance on state-mandated assessments.

 
AdvisersThomas Schnick; Barbara Bailey
SchoolWALDEN UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 71-11, p. , Oct 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational administration; Elementary education; Reading instruction
Publication Number3423184
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3423184
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.